Know what a transport breaks before you run a single test.
VoltusWave SAP Test Intelligence reads every transport before it lands, tells you exactly which tests are safe, healable, or broken, and writes the evidence straight back into SAP Cloud ALM. Built for ECC-to-S/4HANA migrations and the change cycles that never stop after.
See an Impact Analysis on Your Own TransportBring one transport request. We'll show you what it breaks — live, in 30 minutes. No SAP access changes required.
Conformant SAP Cloud ALM test automation provider — the same integration class as Tricentis, Worksoft, and UiPath.
Transport-first impact analysis across Dynpro, Fiori/UI5 and classic GUI · Built on SAP PartnerEdge entitlements · Piloting now with manufacturing-sector S/4HANA programs.
From transport diff to a ranked verdict list
Four things, in the order they happen on a real change cycle.
Predicts impact before the run
When a transport lands in your non-productive landscape, SATIP reads what actually changed — down to the screen field and the customer Z-object — and scores every existing test before you start the cycle. You walk in already knowing where the risk is.
Generates the tests you're missing
It builds executable test cases from the change itself, including the custom objects your standard process scope never describes. Tests run natively: a UI5-aware runner for Fiori, SAP GUI scripting for classic Dynpro. You don't pick the runner — it picks itself from the target.
Heals itself when screens drift
A field moves, a modal appears, a control gets renamed — SATIP diagnoses the failure, repairs the step, and retries. Repairs that prove themselves get promoted into the test permanently, so the same drift never costs you twice.
Writes evidence back into Cloud ALM
SATIP doesn't replace your system of record — it feeds it. Results, traceability, and the change rationale land inside SAP Cloud ALM, where audit, SOX, and GxP reviewers already look.
No overlap with the change. Run as-is.
Minor drift on touched fields. Auto-repaired at runtime.
Field retyped or flow changed. Test step rebuilt.
Field removed, no safe path. Flagged for human review.
The three objections you're already thinking
“Our SAP environment is too customised.”
That's exactly the case it's built for. Standard test scope describes standard processes. SATIP derives what to test from what your transport changed — Z-programs and all — so your customisation is the input, not the blind spot.
“We don't have bandwidth to stand up another tool.”
There's no agent to roll out across your landscape. SATIP reads non-productive systems and integrates as a Cloud ALM provider through a standard endpoint registration. Your team's first task is to bring one transport and watch.
“We've tried test automation before and it failed.”
Brittle scripts fail because they don't know what changed. SATIP starts from the transport diff and heals on a typed intermediate representation, not on fragile recorded scripts — so a screen change becomes a repair, not a red build.
We used to find out a test was broken by running it and watching it fail. Now we get the list before the cycle starts — and the broken ones are already flagged. That's the whole game for a migration.
A golden-master run against pre-conversion ECC, delta-scored against converted S/4HANA, turns a manual regression sweep into a ranked verdict list — coverage that doesn't depend on perfect ChaRM or TBOM discipline.
The answers, straight
How hard is the integration?
SATIP registers as a Cloud ALM test automation provider through standard endpoint registration in the Landscape Management Service — the same public, self-service mechanism Tricentis and Worksoft use. No SAP certification gate blocks it. Cloud ALM stays your authoritative record; SATIP writes into it.
Is it safe to point at our systems?
Extraction is read-only. Test execution runs only against non-productive clients, under a named technical user, with no document creation in productive systems. Inbound calls are OAuth-secured; TLS terminates at your gateway.
What does it cost?
Pricing is structured around the migration program, not per-seat sprawl. SATIP is a time-boxed wedge through your ECC-to-S/4HANA window, so we scope it to the program and its hypercare tail. Bring your landscape size and timeline to the demo and we'll size it concretely.
How long until it's running?
The first impact analysis runs in the demo. A working end-to-end pilot — one real test generated, executed, and written back to CALM — is a matter of days against a prepared non-productive system, not a multi-month rollout.
How big a team do we need?
One person who can bring a transport and a non-productive client. There's no automation framework for your team to build or maintain — SATIP generates, runs, and heals; your engineers review verdicts and sign off.
Does it work on Fiori, or just classic GUI?
Both. The engine selects a UI5-aware runner for Fiori/UI5 and a SAP GUI scripting runner for classic Dynpro automatically, from the surface the change touches.
Does it replace Solution Manager or Cloud ALM?
No. It integrates with them. It doesn't replicate EWA or BPMon, and it doesn't generate ABAP. It supplies better-targeted tests and deterministic results, and leaves the audited chain where it belongs.
You're going to test this migration either way.
The only question is whether you start the cycle knowing where the risk is — or find out by running into it. SATIP turns “run everything and hope” into a ranked list of exactly what changed, what's safe, and what's already broken. Bring one transport and see it on your own objects.
See an Impact Analysis on Your Own Transport30 minutes. Your transport. No changes to your environment.
I've watched too many SAP teams discover a broken test the same way: by running it and watching it fail, three days into a cutover window that doesn't have three days to spare. The screen had changed, the script didn't know, and nobody found out until the run. Multiply that across a few thousand tests and a migration deadline, and “testing” becomes the thing everyone dreads instead of the thing that gives them confidence.
The honest problem is that most SAP test tools react. They run the test, the test fails, and then a person figures out why. But the change already happened — it's sitting right there in the transport. The information you need to know what's at risk exists before the run. We just weren't using it.
That's why we built VoltusWave SAP Test Intelligence. It starts where the change starts — the transport — reads what actually moved, and tells you the verdict before you spend a cycle finding out the hard way. When a screen drifts, it repairs itself instead of going red. And it writes the evidence back into the system your auditors already trust.
What our teams get now isn't “faster testing.” It's walking into a migration cycle already knowing the map — which tests are safe, which need a touch, which are broken — and spending their time on the ten things that matter instead of the thousand that didn't change. That's the difference between dreading the test phase and trusting it.